By carefully reading the racing forum, attending workouts, quizzing the stewards and trainers, jockeys and groomsman, one can skillfully pick more winners than losers.
Outside the Beltway A federal judge has ruled that poker is a game of skill and that therefore betting money on it is not gambling. The decision by Judge Jack Weinstein in Brooklyn was embraced by advocates of card games pushing to legalize Internet poker in the United States. The judge relied extensively on the findings of a defense expert who analyzed online poker games.
There were no allegations in the case that organized crime was involved or that anything such as money laundering or loansharking occurred. That, anyhow, is how one federal judge saw it from his chambers in the Federal District Court in Brooklyn. The decision comes as state courts across the country are grappling with whether playing poker defies the law. No federal court had ever ruled directly on whether poker sun cruz casino port canavaral gambling.
He was arrested last summer, charged with operating an illegal gambling business, of which he was convicted in July. He faced up to 10 years in prison. He called an expert witness, Randal D. Heeb, an economist, statistician and poker player in national tournaments, who testified in a special hearing about the skill involved.
I should note that Mark Twain foretold this decision casino casino gambling poker roulette back in At that time, in Kentucky said the Hon.
Jim Sturgis was retained to defend them when the case came up, of course. The more he studied casino free game play slots the matter and looked into the evidence, the plainer it was that he must lose a case at last — there was no getting around that painful fact.
Those boys had certainly been betting money on a game of chance. Even public sympathy was roused in behalf of Sturgis. People said it was a pity to see him mar his successful career with a big prominent case like this, which must go against him. But after several restless nights an casino millennium idea flashed upon Sturgis, and he sprang out of bed delighted.
He thought he saw his way through. The next day he whispered around a little among his clients and a few friends, and then when the case came up in court he acknowledged the seven-up and the betting, and, as his sole defence, had the astounding effrontery to put in the plea that old sledge was not a game of chance!
There was the broadest sort of a smile all over the faces of that sophisticated audience. The judge smiled with the rest. But Sturgis maintained a countenance whose earnestness was even severe. The opposite counsel tried to ridicule him out of his position, and did not succeed. The judge jested in a ponderous judicial way about the thing, but did not move him.
The matter was becoming grave. The judge lost a little of his patience, and said the joke had gone far enough. Jim Sturgis said he knew of no joke in the matter — his clients could not be punished for indulging in what some people chose to consider a game of chance, until it was proven that it was a game of chance.
Judge and counsel best casino safest that would be an easy matter, and forthwith called Deacons Job, Peters, Burke, and Johnson, and Dominies Wirt and Miggles, to testify; and they unanimously and with strong feeling put down the legal quibble of Sturgis, by pronouncing that old sledge was a game of chance.
Instead of being the simplest case in the world, it had somehow turned out to be an excessively knotty one. The judge scratched his head over it a while, and said there was no way of coming to a determination, because just as many men could be brought into court who would testify on one side, as could be found to testify on the other. But he said he was willing to do the fair thing by all parties, and would act upon any suggestion Mr.
Sturgis would federal judge rules poker is not gambling for the solution of the difficulty. They retired to the jury room. In about two hours, Deacon Peters sent into court to borrow three dollars from a friend. The rest of the story can be told briefly. About daylight the jury came in, and Deacon Job, the foreman, read the following We, the jury in the case of the Commonwealth of Kentucky vs.
John Wheeler et al. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. He earned a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter. I remember playing in a couple of great seedy places while in collage. It takes great skill to fill out an NCAA tournament bracket and since the 1st seed never loses to a 16 seed, what part of luck or chance plays into this decision?
Hence this is not gambling, it is based on the skill of picking the 1 seed every time. And what about playing the ponies. By carefully reading federal judge rules poker is not gambling racing forum, attending workouts, quizzing the stewards and trainers, jockeys and groomsman, one can skillfully pick more winners than losers.
I still laugh at people who play on the boats. Had a buddy of mine who played them regularly black jackand he insisted he won more often than not. Nothing I said could sway him from this position. I asked him, can you count cards? There is a reason that top players win consistently.
All Original Content Copyright by OTB. Judge: Poker Betting Not Gambling But Game of Skill. A federal judge has ruled that poker is a game of skill and that therefore betting money on it is not gambling. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that poker is more a game of skill than chance and cannot be prosecuted under a law created to stop organized crime families from making millions of dollars from gambling.
They saw his little game. He brought in a cloud of witnesses, and produced an overwhelming mass of testimony, to show that old sledge was not a game of chance, but a game of science. Sturgis was on his feet in a second:. There was no disputing the fairness of the proposition. About daylight the jury came in, and Deacon Job, the foreman, read the following. We, the jury in the case of the Commonwealth of Kentucky vs. FILED UNDER: EntertainmentJames JoynerLaw and the Courts.
Poker Bots Invade Online Gambling Sites. New York Judge Upholds Injunction Shutting Down Draft Kings And Fan Duel In New York. DraftKings and FanDuel Banned in New York. About James Joyner James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltwayan associate professor of security studies at the Marine Corps Command and Staff Collegeand a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.
Wednesday, August 22, at Does this open the door to a professional Scrabble circuit? Fields: Is this a game of chance? Fields: Not the way I play it. Darn it, Sam, I just went to IMDB for that quote! Now what do I do with it? Judge Weinstein is a legend. This merely adds to his legacy. If you are playing the odds, you are still just playing the odds. The game is rigged.
And may I remind everyone that the Lottery is a tax on people who are really bad at math. Thursday, August 23, at Of course, people who say this are really bad at economics particularly grasping the concept of marginal utility. Reflections on the Passing of Will Moore. Trump Orders Syria Strikes. Donald Trump And The Inevitable Foreign Policy Crisis. The Politics of Gorsuch.NEW YORK -- A federal judge ruled Tuesday that poker is more a game of skill than chance and cannot be prosecuted under a law created to stop organized crime families from making millions of dollars from gambling. A federal judge has ruled that poker is a game of skill and that therefore betting money on it is not gambling. Larry Neumeister, Associated Press. Tuesday, Aug. 21, | 6 p.m. NEW YORK — A federal judge ruled Tuesday that poker is more a game of skill than chance and cannot be prosecuted under a law created to stop organized crime families from making millions of dollars from gambling.